La réduction linguistique, loin d’être une oppression culturelle est lisibilité civilisationnelle. Seules les quelques langues modernes sont capables d’éduquer, de coder, d’évaluer la santé publique, de narrer des conflits, d’indexer les archives, qui dominent le monde réel. Les dialectes n’ayant pas d’archives, ils n’ont pas de futur. La transition vers un langage mondialement interprétable est une obligation morale, technique et sécuritaire. L’avenir s’écrit en anglais, se discute en français, se structure en allemand.
- 2006 : 2727 NGOs ECOSOC
- 2024 : 6469 NGOs ECOSOC
- 2025 : 10 to 12 millions allow anonymous volunteers
- PROBLEMS :
- No gender parity constraint
- Anonymous volunteers
- Many jurisdictions forms (Associations, Societies,Foundations, Charitable Trusts, Non-Profit Corporations, Hybridation forms)
Registration: NGOs must be registered with relevant government authorities.
Is humanitarianism today a lie used AGAINST our progressive states?
NGOs are quasi-governmental. The Nature and Regulation of NGOs:
19th Century and Earlier: While the term "NGO" is more modern, precursors to NGOs existed. They were often localized, informal, or tied to institutions. The international system, as we know it, was nascent.
Post-WWII Boom: The real explosion in the number of NGOs began after World War II, driven by several factors. Historical Growth of NGOs: "Less than a Hundred" Before the 20th Century.
SUPPOSITION /// These NGOs, supported by random workers, have been steadily increasing since 1990 and especially since 2020. Should we read this as a model used to blur the true unemployment figures on the 5 continents? Should we understand this as an attempt at cultural and racial extortion in light of the shift in parity avoided for inclusion (see rape). Should we read this as an attempt to blur the sciences in the face of demographic whims? Since 1970, 95% of the world's population has been literate. The creation of the "poor" is a pretext serving the desire for demographic excesses as much as sexist (non-binding parity) and racist (inclusion claims that it is a choice to lighten dark skin to achieve the white privilege of being white) behavior. WHAT TO THINK about an model of organization designed to operate in a war situation that becomes a business model contextualized to a war? Fake news? /// SUPPOSITION--
FOR WHO ARE YOU WORKING TODAY ? ARE YOU WORKING AGAINST YOURSELF INSIDE A FAKE NGO ?
